Are your eyebrows getting thinner? If you want thick and luscious brows, consider cosmetic eyebrow enhancement. There are several options to choose from, but many people need clarification on microshading, microblading, or nanobrows. There are also hybrids of these services available.
We can help you unlock the mystery behind these trending techniques so you can make the best decision for your needs.
Microblading: brows that look natural
This popular technique utilizes a hand-held tool that deposits pigment with tiny needles. The result is ultra-fine strokes that resemble hair. This is one of the most realistic eyebrow enhancements, offering a crisp aesthetic with definition. For those who have naturally thin brows, it adds shape and takes care of gaps. Nanoblading is very similar to this treatment but uses an even smaller needle, which improves accuracy and can be less painful.
Pros: Looks exceptionally natural and can last up to three years.
Cons: Can’t cover patchy brows, may not be suitable for oily skin or large pores, and can blur over the years.
Microblading myths
Microblading doesn’t disappear completely. It slowly fades over time, but some shadowy residue can remain.
It isn’t a replacement for an eyebrow pencil. You may still need to use eyebrow pencils or makeup for different looks or to conceal fading.
It isn’t a cure-all for sparseness. While it does look realistic, it can only do so much for super thin brows. A combination treatment with microshading is better in this case.
Nano brows: It’s all in the details
For a more precise look, opt for nano brows, aka hair stroke brows. This treatment uses a digital machine with a single needle, brushing on hair strokes individually. Many people view this as a more refined take on microblading. It’s less invasive than microblading due to using a machine rather than a manual blade, and offers a more exact finish. When completed by a skilled professional, nano brows look more varied and softer, which is perfect for a feathered look.
Pros: A fluffier, diffused hairstroke that mimics the feathering trend, a wider range of eyebrow patterns, and a less invasive process that works on both mature and sensitive skin.
Cons: It can’t cover bare areas completely, can fade more rapidly than microblading, and is harder to master than the art of microblading for aestheticians.
Nano brow myths
It’s not always the most natural look. Since it depends on the eyebrow artist, a poorly done nano brow will almost always look worse than a moderately skilled person doing microblading.
You’ll never need eyebrow makeup. Like microblading, it offers an everyday look but can’t offer the versatility of cosmetic products.
They’re the best choice for oily skin. Although they’re better than microblading for oily skin, microshading is better as it can hold better on oily skin and prevent blur.
Microshading: The fuller, the better
Sometimes referred to as ombre brows or powder brows, microshading creates a look shockingly similar to makeup. Resembling eyebrow powder. It can be subtle or well-defined based on your desires and is ideal for problematic skin issues like excess oil. It’s simpler to maintain than the other techniques and won’t lead to that unpleasant ‘blurry’ look.
Pros: Offers more defined shape and volume, very versatile, minimally invasive, works on all skin types, and looks polished like makeup. It’s also easier to maintain in the long-term without complications.
Cons: You can’t simulate hairlines.
Microshading myths
Microshading looks unnatural. In reality, it’s a highly customizable and bespoke look that perfectly blends natural color and fullness. Whether you want daring statement brows or a light, powdery look, microshading can achieve it.
A hybrid of microshading and nano brows or microblading: best of both worlds
Combine different hairstroke techniques. This can be superior to choosing only one. However, it still has different benefits and considerations.
Pros: A fuller look than singular methods, better coverage for bareness, moderately suitable for oily skin and mimics the look of cosmetics.
Cons: Though this method is versatile, there is still a risk of ink residue exiting as time goes on. With excessive pigment saturation, you might need to switch to pure microshading or get laser removal.